Last month in December 2012, I read with interest on the Punggol East case where their former MP and Speaker of Parliament, Michael Palmer resigned following his admission of a relationship with a member of the People's Association staff.
I thought, “Oh
my, another By Election 2013 is on the table again. What an interesting
political scenario we have here in Singapore with memories of the GE2011,
PE2011, BE2012 still fresh in our minds.”
Then the
first opposition side, the Worker’s Party called the Prime Minister for the By
Election to be held as soon as possible, the same call was also echoed by
Singapore Democratic Party & Reform Party.
Another thought
came to my mind, “What makes WP so interested in the Punggol East By Election
when they have always been very ‘silent’ in Parliament?”
Hmm...
On Worker’s Party
At GE2011 and
BE2012 rallies, they roar as loud as a tiger but in Parliament; other than Mr
Low Thia Kiang’s, “Cheaper, Better and Faster” debate which left Mr Lim Swee
Say at loss of words (hope no offense intended to the minister), nothing entertaining
came out of the debate since then.
Their
star-catch Mr Chen Show Mao is of no show either. He has been neutral, high likely
he agrees with the Ruling Party or I guess he has been ‘gagged’ under his own
party whip. When he asked the Ruling party to ‘do more for its citizens’, this
came to a point back at him: ‘What has he done for us so far after 18 months?’
Next, Pritam
Singh. I recalled one of the article [here] where it reflected badly on his online
engagement with a member of public especially with a well-known local blogger
Andrew Loh. They have since made up but still
I wasn’t impressed with his opinion & replies with regards to the online
social media. WP’s Pritam Singh got it wrong.
I, myself
went online through blog and social media to create awareness and campaign
against Xenophobia. Took a few goodie months to wake some people up &
finally people are more aware of the difference between right or wrong. The men
on top even came to know about what I am doing at that point of time &
responded positively. Xenophobia thus
became a thing of past now. So what do you have to say about my example, Mr Pritam
Singh?
I do not meet
some people nor accept their invitations because I feel that the focus is on
the topic itself which is of national concern, xenophobia will put Singapore's reputation in bad light. It is not about myself and it may become
too personal. It would not make much difference. Still social media proved a point.
It worked for me.
The
interesting part here is about Aljinued-Hougang Town Council. After they
received the handover from the former Aljunied Town Council in 2011, we heard
nothing of their findings on how the previous team performed.
Not even on the case of AIM where they knew of this private company
being linked to PAP. After AHTC got a red
mark, their chairman Ms Sylvia Lim came out with a lot of ‘ammunitions’ to fire.
Has she become too defensive on their poor TC management, trying to draw
away public attention to PAP and their $2 shell company because she knew of the By
Elections coming? Political sense.
Up to date, the Prime Minister Lee has called for AIM’s
review. Let’s wait till then. No comments on this.
Overall, the
fact goes to show that AHTC has failed to perform given a time-frame of 18
months & they have no right to call for a By Election & give Punggol East voters a
choice. Excuse me, the public are not daft.
What is the
point of having another WP MP in parliament when your party ran out of credible
candidates? Is WP trying to build their presence in parliament warming up the
bench every 5 years, leaving majority of the people who voted for you only to
remain silent with nothing further to add? No comment? Is this your intent?
If we think the
current national changes have something to do with Worker’s Party presence in
Parliament, I am afraid we are mistaken. All long it has always been the people
voice itself that prompt the ruling party to make changes. People’s voices are
adopted, not WP’s.
On Singapore Democratic Party
Known to
stage protests, abolish this ACT or abolish that ACT. Simi ACT also wanna abolish. Where is the balance? Their
party members get into trouble with the laws as a result of their reckless
actions in name of democracy or whatever civil obedience. You may say I do not know
or understand democracy but this is not the kind of democracy I want to see. I
am sure many share my sentiments. Can’t democracy be done peacefully with less
drama & better impact aimed to improve for the ruling party’s
consideration to reform?
Please do not
become copycats of what others overseas have been doing. We are Singapore.
If SDP wants
to win, they will have to learn how to play by the rules of the game in
political scene. In soccer game where two teams have to abide by the rules set
by FIFA. If you flout the rules, you get penalized.
On positive
note, I give SDP credit where it is due. The SDP members have contributed well in
other areas, not only on the online social media platform. Their team made several
attempts to propose new policies knowing the pros and cons especially to the
point where their policies would not be adopted. They never gave up trying. They
have been through a lot, ups and downs. Trials and tribulations made their men
and women.
Their party has also
attracted quite a number of professionals from private & public sectors. They worked & proposed policies change better than
the Workers Party who merely reserved their seats to warm the benches in parliament.
Take the
case of Minister’s Salaries Reviews where WP held their proposal till the
last parliament day & their proposal is not of much difference to the dismay of public.
SMRT's PRC worker's strike case, they are the last party to speak up. Ironically they spoke up first on the first sight of By Elections. An opportunist?
Conclusion
SDP deserves a chance to make their party presence felt. If the SDP
intent to contest in Punggol East to provide another alternative voice for the
people, they should make their announcement early to field Dr Paul Tambyah. Dr
Tambyah himself is considered a heavy weight candidate with stellar resume in
medical field. Everyone knows that a
multi-corner fight is a disaster for the opposition.
For opposition unity, it
is best that Worker’s Party, Reform Party and Singapore Democratic Alliance back
out of the contest. WP does not have a credible candidate to field, while RP
and SDA lacks of resources. That leaves SDP the best opposition choice to contest.
Co-driver's Analogy
Mr Low Thia
Kiang’s co-driver analogy has proven to be a failure for 18 months. The co-drivers are sleeping & snoring in parliament. In order to slap both the
sleeping co-driver and the driver, we will put another credible co-driver to
keep them on their toes!
Little Fish’s note:
I may have given my review & choice of opposition party to contest but it does not make me an opposition supporter. No links again to whatsoever parties. Thank you for reading.
From CNA:
ReplyDelete/// The 40-year-old surgeon is a fresh face although he has been a grassroots volunteer since 2002.... ///
/// "I remember when I finally got my HDB flat in 1988, just after I ORD from the army, my wife and I had to borrow money from my uncle to do renovations. ///
40-year-old -- that means he was born in 1973 (or 1972). That means he was at most 16 when he ORD. You mean the SAF take in kids when they are 14??? Is this child labour or what???
Married at 16 -- wow!!!
And got a flat at 16???
How many years waiting time???
You mean can apply for HDB flats when 16 years old or younger???
Correction bud, it is 1998. Not 1988
ReplyDelete